The KT was better armored than the IS-but in a duel let say were the tanks were under 300m appart from each other, with the power of the 1mm gun of the IS-, could the KT armor wistand that kind of power at such close range. Which-tank-was-better-the-King-Ti. King Tiger vs the best of the rest лис.
Схожі Перекласти цю сторінку бер. Individual tank against individual tank , the nod goes to the Tiger II.
The IS-was really more intended to match the Tiger or Panther. Tiger II was a truly massive vehicle, the same length and width as an M-Abrams and feet taller. – Which would win, one Tiger Tank. How did German tanks compare to Russian. Which tank would win in a one-on-one battle.
Turhaturpamonths ago. Повідомити про інше зображення Поскаржитись на вміст зображення.
The IS Tank was a series of heavy tanks developed as a successor to the KV- series by the Soviet Union during World War II. The heavy tank was designed with thick armor to counter German mm guns and carried a main gun capable of defeating Tiger and Panther tanks. In terms of the triad of metrics for tanks —firepower, armor and mobility—the Tiger II was quite impressive.
It was mainly a breakthrough tank , firing a heavy . It was probably better than its American rival, the lighter and less heavily armored forty-six-ton American M-Pershing. THE NEW GENERATION OF SOVIET ARMOR VS. The first Tigers were issued to the 1st platoon of the 5Battalion of Heavy Tanks (Schwere Panzer Abteilung 502). Is this a true thing, or is this another one of those exaggerations? Effects of a 1mm shell from the D-gun on German Panther, Tiger, and Tiger II tanks.
Welcome My question is simple: which of those two tanks ( ISor Tiger ) is in yours opinion better ? Late war German steel was also prone to failure due to the high carbon content . As the war on the Eastern. Even immediately, after the Tiger had received approval, a new German heavy tank underwent development due to the Tiger already being six years old (design wise). The Soviets had been quick to develop tanks that could fight the Tiger on an equal footing, but these were developed as part of a c. It debuted in the battle of Normandy and fought on both the .
As a prelude to the post-war concept of a single main battle tank design, vehicles during World War II tended to be categorized as light. Nashorns were one of the wars best anti- tank destroyers and a nashorn claimed the only . And yes it is about 2kph slower than Pershing, but for tank v tank that means nothing and vs AT infantry all the heavies are slow enough to be easy kills. Ofc if you wanted to trade .
